A controlled study into the effects of psychoeducation for patients with cognitive disturbances

The therapeutic results of an experimental neuropsychological rehabilitation program, Function-Oriented Guidance (FOG), for patients with mild cognitive disturbances were examined and compared with a regular Function Training (FT) program. FOG is based on thorough evaluation of neuropsychological test results, psychoeducation, and individual counseling. Within the FOG group, but not the FT group, patients' worries decreased and their level of knowledge increased. The results imply that psychoeducation may be of therapeutic value in patients with cognitive disturbances because it improves the way they cope with their handicaps. Contrary to expectations, between-group analyses showed few differences between the programs. Nevertheless, it can be concluded that psychoeducation for cognitively disturbed patients can contribute to improving their quality of life. However, further research with more patients is necessary

A desktop expert system for the differential diagnosis of dementia:an evaluation study

Evince-I is a desktop expert system for the differential diagnosis of dementia, implemented on a personal computer. It is intended to assess the effectiveness of this new technology in modeling a psychiatrist who uses international guidelines for diagnosing dementia. EVINCE-I was tested in diagnosing 19 patients with varying stages of dementia and 10 patients showing other disorders except dementia. EVINCE-I and the human expert were in perfect agreement on the diagnosis of dementia and correlated highly on the diagnosis of dementia of the Alzheimer type and multiple infarct dementia. EVINCE-I thus offers important possibilities as a tool in investigating the data and procedures used by the human expert

Differential diagnosis of dementia:a comparison between the expert system EVINCE and clinicians

The diagnostic performance of the expert system EVINCE was compared with that of 85 clinicians in diagnosing 10 patients suspected of suffering from dementia. A multidisciplinary expert committee provided a standard diagnosis as reference for comparison. The results showed that the syndrome and etiologic diagnoses made by EVINCE were in very close agreement with those of the expert committee and that the diagnostic performance of EVINCE was better than that of the average clinician. The present findings indicate that expert systems, especially those within the realm of complex multidimensional medical problems, could be a valuable aid in medical practice

Comparison of seven sets of criteria used for the diagnosis of vascular dementia

At least seven different sets of criteria are commonly used for the diagnosis of vascular dementia (VaD). These are the ischemic scales (IS) of Hachinski, Rosen and Loeb, the criteria from the DSM-III-R, those outlined by Erkinjuntti et al., the State of California Alzheimer''s Disease Diagnostic and Treatment Centers (ADDTC) and the international workgroup of the American National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) and the European ''Association Internationale pour la Recherche et l''Enseignement en Neurosciences''. To investigate the differences and similarities of these criteria, we applied them to a sample of 124 demented patients from the Maastricht Memory Clinic. Only 8 patients were diagnosed as having VaD by all criteria. Depending on which criteria were used, the frequencies of VaD and Alzheimer''s disease (AD) ranged from 6 to 32%, and from 48 to 56%, respectively. The IS of Hachinski and Rosen resulted in the highest frequencies of VaD, whereas the criteria of Erkinjuntti and those from the ADDTC and the NINDS workgroup yielded the lowest. The number of patients with VaD was reduced substantially when neuroradiological data and the temporal relationship between stroke and dementia were taken into consideration. We conclude that the seven sets of criteria cannot be regarded as interchangeable. Differences in the criteria for VaD and AD may be an overlooked source of interstudy variance

Dementia, awareness and depression

We examined 170 outpatients, 103 with Alzheimer's disease, 43 with vascular dementia and 24 with various other causes, in order to investigate whether or not depressive symptoms were more likely to occur in dementia patients who had some degree of awareness of their cognitive deterioration. Awareness was rated on a four‐point scale that assessed discrepancies between the patient's and the caregiver's history. The level of awareness was significantly related to the severity of dementia but not to depression or to the score on Hamilton's depression scale. However, the score from the item “psychic anxiety” showed a weak but significant correlation with the level of awareness of one's deficits. It is concluded that intact awareness of deterioration was not clearly related to the development of depression or depressive symptoms in dementia

Depression, insight, and personality changes in alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia

Although it is generally believed that depression, retained insight, and preserved personality occur more frequently in vascular dementia than in Alzheimer's disease, there is little empiric evidence for this presumption. Most studies on this subject have been carried out with severely demented inpatients, and confounding factors such as age, sex, and severity of dementia have not been sufficiently taken into account. We compared 48 patients with relatively mild vascular dementia with 48 patients with Alzheimer's disease, matched for age, sex, and stage of dementia, to investigate if depression, lack of insight, and personality changes were related to the cause of dementia. The two groups did not differ regarding the incidence of major depression, the mean depression score, the awareness score, or the sum of scores on the items of the Blessed Dementia Scale concerning personality changes. We conclude that depression, lack of insight, and personality changes do not favor an etiology of vascular dementia over that of Alzheimer's disease. The present findings underscore the notion that the severity of the dementia should be considered in studies on the differences between vascular dementia and Alzheimer's disease